Welcome Guest, Not a member yet? Create Account  


Forum Statistics

14 Members,   3,536 Topics,   10,207 Replies,   Latest Member is Stanley


  JZ - Greek Love (1964)
Posted by: WMASG - 12-15-2025, 08:52 PM - Replies (1)

   


A liaison or mateship between adult and child ("child" here means a prepuberal boy) is a much rarer thing and may or may not involve overt sexual contact. The very few instances of this of which I have any knowledge show clear evidence of being substitutions. Either the older partner takes the role of surrogate parent, big brother, uncle, grandfather, etc., to the child, or he is trying to relive with the child a much earlier experience, one dating back to his own childhood or adolescence; sometimes both. The latter type of substitution is the more unhealthy insofar as the man may not be reacting to the child as he actually is but rather to the image of the youngster in the former experience—a lessened contact with reality. (I am omitting two cases where the older partner was evidently feeble-minded and the relationship may have been nearly symmetrical, as in each of these he and the child seemed to be about on a level in vocabulary and interest.) Sometimes a genuine asymmetrical love seemed to be developing (the outcome being a Greek love situation); sometimes the adult was only a means to the child’s ends—presents, romping, physical pleasures—rather than vice versa. In each of these instances sex, where it occurred at all, was only a part of a larger relationship; and though I cannot say that the relationships were handled responsibly, yet all of them appeared to be handled tenderly, and the youngsters were not noticeably harmed. This is also confirmed by a number of individuals (mostly heterosexual) who are known to me to have been the recipients of such sexual and quasi-sexual attentions in their own preadolescent years, and who nevertheless suffered no known harm from them, as they were never caught.

Nevertheless, though one must judge each case on its own merits, I cannot defend this type of relationship to the degree or in the manner that I am defending Greek love. For one thing, the danger of getting caught is possibly even greater than in Greek love, and the penalties are likely to be severer with decreasing age of the child; the presumption by legal authorities and social workers is always that the child is innocent and was led astray by the wicked adult; the panic reaction by parents and others (source of most damage to the child) is doubtless going to be greater than it would be in the event that the youngster were already in his teens; in summary, the psychological danger of damage to the child in the event of discovery is probably greater than it would be for an adolescent (though this is disputable); and the child is more vulnerable in every way than is the adolescent (the most important single point so far). Morever, the mere fact that such liaisons are substitutions is almost automatic evidence that they originate in sickness. (Exceptions are possible, of course; such a liaison may arise from a teacher-pupil relationship, e.g. in private tutoring; or the "substitution" may occur in such a situation as an adult’s having lost a son, daughter, kid brother, etc., and seeking a replacement.)

Whatever may be said of the mental health of an individual who allows himself to be drawn into a casual sexual encounter with a child—even an importunately enthusiastic little seducer with a great deal of spontaneous affection—still Harry Stack Sullivan’s conclusion remains for the most part valid: a preadolescent child is a bundle of needs, capable mostly of what Maslow calls "deficiency love," a projection of his own need to be loved, and only seldom aware of other people as individuals with needs, feelings and vulnerabilities of their own. It follows that an adult limited to preadolescent children for love- or sex-objects is forfeiting any chance of a meaningful response, a genuine return of love; a preadolescent child, however affectionate he may be, is simply not yet ready for the kind of genuine emotional commitment which becomes usual in adolescence and therefore an important feature of Greek love.

[...]

Continue reading..

  Silent No More (2012)
Posted by: WMASG - 12-15-2025, 08:45 PM - Replies (1)

   


Victim 1, at fourteen years of age, spoke up against Jerry Sandusky in the Penn State scandal, and now for the first time tells his story.

Aaron Fisher was an eager and spirited eleven-year-old when legendary Penn State football coach Jerry Sandusky recruited him into his Second Mile children’s charity. Offering support at a critical time in Aaron’s life, Sandusky gave him gifts and attention, winning the boy’s trust even as he isolated him from his family and peers. Before long, Sandusky’s attention escalated into sexual assault. When Aaron summoned the courage to speak up, he found himself ostracized and harassed by the very people who were supposed to protect him. The investigation set off by his coming forward would drag on for three years—and would launch the biggest scandal in the history of sports.

In Silent No More, Aaron Fisher recounts his harrowing quest to bring Sandusky’s crimes to light—from the intense feelings of guilt that kept him from speaking up earlier and the fear he felt at accusing a man who was a pillar of the community and a hero to the largest alumni network in the world, to the infuriating delays in the arrest and conviction of his abuser. He catalogs the devastating personal toll the case took on him: the shattered relationships, panic attacks, and betrayal of trust that continued to haunt him even after the charges went public in the fall of 2011. But he also speaks of his mother’s desperate efforts to get him out of harm’s way, the invaluable help of psychologist Michael Gillum, and the vindication he felt at inspiring numerous other victims to step forward . . . and at knowing that, thanks to him, there would be no future victims of Jerry Sandusky.

In the end, Aaron Fisher won his fight to expose the truth, achieving some measure of closure. Told in the honest and unforgettable voices of Aaron; his mother, Dawn; and his psychologist, Mike, this inspiring book completes Aaron’s transformation from a nameless casualty into a resounding voice for change.

Continue reading..

  Coming Out (1977)
Posted by: WMASG - 12-15-2025, 08:35 PM - Replies (1)

   



That was Friday night. Saturday, Roger got drunk and stayed drunk all that day and night. His mind lurched through a jungle of erotic fantasy, with faces, breasts, buttocks, thighs, arms, and strewn hair, all emerging and disappearing in the darkness. But in the chaos, one face kept reappearing. That face was Michael’s.
He had seen that face in classic Greek sculpture, in the works of Michelangelo, and in the lobby of the hotel. The close-cropped, curly hair. The delicate balance of the features. The ambivalence about the lips that seemed always verging on a smile or a pout. The big difference was that the face in the hotel lobby was very much alive.
Although the face, on those chance encounters, had looked at him, eyes as direct and inquiring as a child’s, Roger had avoided contact. Beautiful boys, he told himself, were just not his thing. In the past? Yes, a few fleeting times best forgotten. But now? He was not prepared for a rerun of Death in Venice. Let the face go its way.
But the face kept cropping up. Every time he encountered it, he had felt a growing disquiet. There was a mystery here that had long since vanished with women. He fancied it an exotic decadence, something out of the Weimar republic or late imperial Rome. With all else tried and lusterless, what waning pleasures could be leeched from epicene young manhood?
So he thought.
One time the face had cropped up wholly unexpectedly. To keep himself in shape, Roger made a habit of walking down the fire stairs from his room on the eighth floor instead of taking the elevator. At a turn of the landing, Roger was suddenly confronted with the face coming out of one of the rooms. In that instant, he noted the room humber — twenty-five. And he heard the sangría voice. “Isn’t the elevator working?”
“Sure,” said Roger. “I just walk down the stairs for exercise.”
“How macho . . .” the voice murmured as Roger took the next flight down.
Thereafter, Roger tried to unremember the room number as irrelevant information. But it stuck in his mind. Number twenty-five.
Late Sunday morning, after his epic drunk, Roger woke up to a glare of intrusive sunlight. Slowly he moved his limbs to make sure they were still there. He moved his head and felt a pulse of dull pain. He pushed himself out of bed, bearing the weight of all human sin on his shoulders, went into the bathroom, took three aspirin washed down with two full glasses of water, and concluded that he might survive. The question of just why he would want to survive was, that morning, unanswerable. He shrugged it off simply as force of habit.
He thought, looking at himself in the mirror, that the habit was perhaps too strong. Persistence in living could approach the ridiculous. But the face that looked back at him from the mirror was, despite some wrinkles and ravages, a lot more presentable than he thought he deserved. Maturity had given it structure; age had not yet pouched or sagged it.
Getting dressed, Roger considered going up to one of the singles bars for a Bloody Mary and brunch — hair of the dog, and all that — but the idea repelled him. The question welled up in his consciousness like nausea: “Roger, what are you trying to prove?”
Roger preferred at that time not to consider the wreckage of his life. He consoled himself with the thought that he still had a job, and he still had his hair, and he presumed he had his sanity. With that, he went out, bought the Sunday Times, and retired to a booth in a nearby coffee shop to empathize with the woes of the world. The Times sedately informed him that the world was going plumb to hell on all fronts, and the news made him feel much better. Everybody else, it seemed, was also mired in the human condition.
Finished with his breakfast, Roger walked the deserted Sunday streets back to his hotel, an establishment of faded gentility on Gramercy Park. He’d thought some in the past year of his bachelorhood of getting an apartment, but he had a liking for residential hotels — always someone at the desk, always someone to take messages, always someone to straighten up his room; and the same time, the ambience of temporality about the place fit his own sense of passage from someplace to an unknown someplace else. He had a suite at the hotel. Living room. Bedroom. And bath.

Continue reading..

  An Idol for Others (1977)
Posted by: WMASG - 12-15-2025, 08:28 PM - Replies (1)

   


He performed the ritual that permitted him to enter his own house — standing within range of the viewer, speaking the formula that indicated the absence of muggers or gunmen lurking in the background — and passed from the late May heat of East Seventy-fifth Street into the air-conditioned citadel of home.
He was immediately caught up in the events of the day. His very executive secretary, Alice, met him in the hall. She had been with him so long that he no longer knew what she looked like.
“Hi, Walter. Did you get it? Are you pleased?”
He held up the small Verdura box he was carrying. “I think she’ll like it.”
“The boys arrived and have gone out again already,” Alice said. “They promised to be on time for lunch. Time sent proofs of their cover story, if you want to read about yourself. All the papers have been calling asking for advance copies of tonight’s speech.”
“That’s the committee’s business. Did we get last week’s grosses?”
“Yes. A bit better than the week before.”
“Real cool, man.” He mocked the jargon of the day with impish eyes. He was a tall man with a fine, well-proportioned figure, but the imp still lurked in his face, around the corners of his slightly upslanting eyes, and shaped the curve of his generous mouth. His habitual expression was impishly mocking. Without giving her more than the surface of his attention, he was aware of her hands fluttering about herself in the way she had when she didn’t know how he would react to what she was going to say.
“There’s a wire of congratulations from the president,” she announced.
“You’re kidding! Who told that creep about our little cultural activities?” Small things like this occasionally assured him that some part of him still functioned at the old level — independently, irreverently, perhaps even creatively.
“David’s waiting upstairs in the library. He brought a friend.”
“Did somebody give them something to drink? Tell Clara to join us. And don’t let anybody through. We’ll go public this evening.” He turned from her. There was an elevator, but he rarely used it; he had always been energetic and liked to keep his youthful body on the move. He climbed the stairs, feeling the house close around him. He had been assured that the air-conditioning reproduced the most ideal outdoor atmospheric conditions, so he knew his sense of suffocation must be psychological. Clara’s cocoon. Inaccurate. Every piece of fine furniture, every glowing picture from Bacon to Zadkine had been coveted more by him than by her.
He turned down a short hall, past some of his splendid possessions and entered the library. He was immediately dazzled by the first sight of David he had had for almost two years: skin

Continue reading..

  A Boy Named Phyllis 1996 (1996)
Posted by: WMASG - 12-15-2025, 08:23 PM - Replies (1)

   



What’s a boy to do? An only child, a little chubby (and carrying it low). By age six already a regular in the Sears Husky Boys Department. Young Frankie is also gay, and he's trapped in the aluminum-sidinged, lawn-sprinklered, what-exit? wilds of New Jersey suburbia. Imagine Elton John born to an Italian-American Edith and Archie Bunker and you've got the picture.

A Boy Named Phyllis is Frank DeCaro’s witty gem of a memoir about growing up among working-class Italian folk in Little Falls, New Jersey. There are the usual trials and tribulations between little Frankie and his parents, Marian and Frank Sr., but this is no angst-ridden, coming-of-age gay memoir. Frank is funny, and A Boy Names Phyllis is the antidote to such books.

It is the mid-1960s and the DeCaros have it all: a living room that no one is allowed to live in; a complete collection of cardboard cutout decorations for every holiday; an Entenmann’s factory around the corner; and a killer lineup of Friday-night TV — The Brady Bunch, The Partridge Family, Room 222, The Odd Couple, and, if you can stay awake long enough, Love, American Style. There's only one problem: instead of developing a crush on Laurie Partridge, Frankie gets a boner for Keith. He perfects a drop-dead Paul Lynde imitation, and ultimately finds liberation through Elton John and Disco.

Continue reading..

Online Users
There is currently 1 user online 0 Member(s) | 1 Guest(s)

Welcome, Guest
You have to register before you can post on our site.

Username
  

Password
  





Search Forums

(Advanced Search)